The Butler Law Firm

  • Home
  • Legal Services
  • Our Wins
  • Client Benefits
  • Blog
  • About
    • Meet Our Staff
  • Contact Us

 

You are here: Home / Laurie Butler / PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST ‘WOULD BE’ INJURED WORKERS BECAUSE THE STATE CERTAINLY ISN’T GOING TO PAY THE BILL

June 12, 2017 by Laurie Butler Leave a Comment

PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST ‘WOULD BE’ INJURED WORKERS BECAUSE THE STATE CERTAINLY ISN’T GOING TO PAY THE BILL

My area of practice is not primarily labor law, however on a few occasions, I have handled claims against uninsured clients by injured workers. The reason I’m addressing this issue right now is because California is on the forefront for leading other states and countries in making changes to worker’s compensation policies.

California has battled danger in the workplace through strict enforcement of its labor laws. If you hire people to work for you and pay them over a certain amount of money, then you must have worker’s compensation insurance. The nightmare of penalties and costs to you if you do not have this insurance, can be devastating, as well as the criminal penalties that could follow.

Recently, I attended a hearing/conference at the Workers Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”), the agency that determines whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor in deciding disputes. I was representing a company being sued by an injured worker for worker’s compensation. The company I was representing did not have worker’s compensation insurance when he performed services for my client.

• He claimed he was an employee; we claimed that he was an independent contractor. He said that he was injured on the job; we challenged the injury, claiming it had occurred prior to working for my client.
• We claimed the man was soliciting jobs as an independent contractor using images from my client’s jobs (on which he had worked); he claimed he was just looking for labor jobs.
• We pointed out that the contractor had accepted pay via an IRS 1099 form, which is how independent contractors are paid; he didn’t argue that point; he just said he thought that was how he was supposed to be paid.
• We had declarations from others, with whom the man worked, that he had brought his own tools, worked when he wanted and did not have to be supervised. They also agreed that he had been injured elsewhere before working for my client.

A little about the Workers Compensation Appeals Board: this state agency doesn’t care one bit what your reasons are for not having worker’s compensation insurance and they don’t take into consideration any financial hardship you may endure if they find for the worker. This agency only wants money for the worker, regardless of whether the employer goes broke while trying to pay. Also, they will rule against you more times than not as to whether your worker was an independent contractor or an employee.

While we felt that we had a strong case in proving that the worker was an independent contractor, the WCAB judge seemed to argue on behalf of the worker during the conference. After all, this is California and it is extremely zealous in protecting its workers. However, the antagonism we were experiencing, lessened somewhat when the judge learned there were likely other deep pockets – two other possible employers – who could compensate the worker. One was the project’s designer; the other a homeowner who is a very well-known member of the entertainment community.

As soon as the judge heard this, he asked when the house had been purchased. “Recently,” was the answer to which he stated, “Oh good. Then the homeowner most likely has worker’s comp insurance through his homeowner’s insurance policy.”

With this insurance, that judge knew he would not have to hold a trial to determine whether the worker was an employee or not. Trials take time and cost the state money which also creates a backlog of work for the judges. So even though we believed we could win this case, it will likely come down to whether the homeowner has worker’s comp insurance.

So here’s my word to the wise: If you employ even a nanny or a maid, and are paying them $100 or more while on the job, you should definitely look into purchasing worker’s comp insurance, either alone or through a homeowner’s policy. Because sooner or later it could happen to you – even if you treat a worker like a member of your family.

Ultimately, those who work in wealthy homes are more savvy now than they used to be and if they run into a situation where they are injured and don’t have the money to pay for their medical bills, then they may be looking to you to help them out.

Filed Under: Laurie Butler Tagged With: business law, business law firm, business lawsuit, employers, independent contractor, litigation, litigation attorney, real estate law, trusts, worker's compensation, workers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • November 2015

Tags

art and creative services broker business law business law firm business lawsuit business litigation business litigation law firm CA Civil Code civil harassment construction law contractor debt restructuring defamation of character domestic harassment entertainment litigation equity fashion law suits flipping houses High Speed Internet internet disputes internet posts lawsuit lawsuits Leases legal representation litigation litigation attorney los angeles attorney professional service lawsuits Read the Lease real estate real estate agent real estate attorney real estate fraud real estate law real estate litigation real estate transactions rehabbing properties residential real estate law restraining order Southern California business attorney TRO trusts women attorneys yelp
  • Dribbble
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Github
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Ending a Law Practice in Los Angeles; Moving to Indiana

On July 31, 2017, I boarded a plane for my hometown of Lafayette, Indiana with two suitcases and a very big smile. I had closed my law practice after 39 years, all spent in Greater Los Angeles. Prior to leaving, I spent two months canceling law firm business contracts, transferring remaining law case files to […]

© 2019 The Butler Law Firm · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy